|
Peter Gichura,
father, wheelchair user and disability activist, is again
threatened with imminent removal back to Kenya, where he
faces political persecution, including death threats, and
the loss of the medical treatment on which his life
depends.
Mr Gichura is suing the Home Office and Kalyx, the private
company which runs Harmondsworth detention centre, for
mistreatment. Very soon
the district judge at Central London County Court will rule
whether Mr Gichura was entitled to protection under the
Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) before December 2006 and
the
Human Rights Act , and therefore if this important
precedent-setting case can continue. The Home Office is
pressing ahead with the deportation of the man who is taking
them to court for discrimination.
The Home Office claims that if he is sent back, Mr Gichura’s
right to a fair hearing of his DDA case won’t be
jeopardised, and that he could pursue his civil action from
Kenya
-- despite having compelling medical and other expert
evidence that the treatment he needs is not available to him
in Kenya and that his life would be in danger.
Whichever way the judge rules, the High Court will soon
decide whether or not Mr Gichura can be deported.
BACKGROUND
Peter Gichura was detained twice in Harmondsworth in
appalling conditions including: not being able to use the
bathroom and toilet properly, suffering painful and
threatening body searches, and on the first occasion
(February 2006) being given the wrong medication. Anne
Owers,
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, condemned the conditions at
Harmondsworth as “the
poorest report we have issued on an Immigration Removal Centre”
(November 2006).
In 2006, when his spinal injury worsened, Mr Gichura applied
for asylum for medical treatment without which he would
die. Expert evidence from Rachel Hurst OBE (Disability
Awareness in Action), a member of the Advisory Group to the
government Office for Disability, confirming this, has been
ignored.
Many other people seeking asylum face a similar fate as Mr
Gichura, and others have already been sent back, because of
a High Court ruling that removal does not contravene Article
3 of the European Convention on Human Rights -- the right
not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment.
In a similar case, recent press coverage has highlighted the
plight of a couple who face a rapid deterioration in their
health and death, if they were deported, because the medical
treatment they need (for HIV) would not be available and
their young son would become an orphan (see
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article2418434.ece
or Independent, 4 April 2007).
In March, Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights
condemned as unacceptable, “the deliberate use of inhumane
treatment” in asylum policy and found that, “Asylum seekers
as a group do not always get the greatest sympathy from
society or the media, but what we have seen and heard
provides very hard evidence of appalling treatment that no
human being should suffer."
Also in March, Anne
McGuire, Minister for Disabled People, signed the UK
government up to
the
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
which prohibits discrimination against people with
disabilities in all areas of life, including access to
justice and the right to health services. But
the Home Office is going against the convention by
continuing High Court proceedings to send Mr Gichura back to
Kenya.
Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, writing in support of
Mr Gichura, said: “I would underline the wider social
consequences of handling cases like these in ways that
entrench . . . a perception that the UK immigration regime
is unbalanced, unjust and inhumane. I recall . . .the
European Convention on Human Rights, “Everyone’s right to
life shall be protected by law.” He proposes discussion
with the Home Office “to find some more humane middle
ground” than the current refusal of medical grounds (Letter
to Liam Byrne, 12 October 2006).
People with disabilities have not only the right to life but
also the right to live free from fear. We are calling on
everyone, and especially those who speak for the disability
community, to defend Peter Gichura’s right to
anti-discrimination protection and safety. A victory in his
case would help establish rights and protections for all.
You can also:
Write to or email the Immigration Minister Liam Byrne,
demanding that Peter Gichura (HO ref: G1053958) be granted
the right to stay – see
model letter
on WinVisible’s
web pages
- or write your own.
Liam Byrne MP
2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 4DF
fax 020 7219 2417
email
liam.byrne.submissions@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk and
byrnel@parliament.uk
Please copy to:
Anne McGuire MP,
Minister for Disabled People
fax 01786 446513
email
mcguirea@parliament.uk
Malcolm Wicks MP
(Mr. Gichura’s MP)
fax 020 8683 0179 email
wicksm@parliament.uk
WinVisible
fax 020 7209 4761 email
winvisible@allwomencount.net
Payday
email
payday@paydaynet.org
WinVisible
(women with visible and invisible disabilities)
Tel 020 7482 2496 (voice/minicom)
winvisible@allwomencount.net
www.allwomencount.net/EWC%20WwDiss/WVindex.htm
Payday,
a network of men working with the Global Women’s Strike
Tel 020 7209 4751 mobile 07803 789699
payday@paydaynet.org
www.refusingtokill.net |